Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 11, 2024. It is now read-only.

refactor: use a string type for Nutanix's AdditionalTrustBundle #28

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 4, 2024

Conversation

dkoshkin
Copy link
Collaborator

@dkoshkin dkoshkin commented Apr 4, 2024

Wanted to propose this.

Use a string instead of a ConfigMap reference to make it easier for both the handlers to use without needing to make additional API calls. And the clients needing to know how to create these ConfigMaps.

@dkoshkin dkoshkin self-assigned this Apr 4, 2024
faiq
faiq previously approved these changes Apr 4, 2024
Copy link

@faiq faiq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i like this approach a lot.

@dkoshkin dkoshkin force-pushed the dkoshkin/refactor-trust-bundle branch from 691c713 to 81a3c9f Compare April 4, 2024 18:34
@dkoshkin dkoshkin requested review from deepakm-ntnx and faiq April 4, 2024 18:35
@dkoshkin dkoshkin force-pushed the dkoshkin/refactor-trust-bundle branch 2 times, most recently from 826c1c7 to b26f26d Compare April 4, 2024 19:03
dkoshkin added 2 commits April 4, 2024 12:15
Use a string instead of a ConfigMap reference
to make it easier for both the handlers to use, and the clients to set in the API.
@dkoshkin dkoshkin force-pushed the dkoshkin/refactor-trust-bundle branch from b26f26d to 0d6a9b1 Compare April 4, 2024 19:16
@dkoshkin dkoshkin merged commit 583014f into main Apr 4, 2024
@dkoshkin dkoshkin deleted the dkoshkin/refactor-trust-bundle branch April 4, 2024 19:49
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Apr 4, 2024
jimmidyson pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2024
* refactor: use a string type for Nutanix's AdditionalTrustBundle

Use a string instead of a ConfigMap reference
to make it easier for both the handlers to use, and the clients to set in the API.

* fix: force insecure: false with additionalTrustBundle
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants